The Syrian War Normalizes Health Care Weapons

Far less attention was given to the Syrian administration’s targeting of health-care centers in rebel territory. This callous strategy, which also represents a crime against from humankind, has made it impossible for humanitarian organisations to give care for wounded soldiers and civilians in some instances.

The Syrian American Medical Society reports that 168 attacks on health centers were completed in the next half of 2016. These hurt at least 80 medical employees and murdered 26.

Running From The Theatre Of War

As a recent report from the medical journal The Lancet indicates, global authorities must behave strategically to discourage further military strikes on humanitarian organisations. Specifically, there is a need to accumulate and disseminate accurate information about the strikes and boost service for overwhelmed health-care employees.

Attempting to do this may not just bring about the future targeting of impartial businesses, for example Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), but also the continuing use of strategies like chemical warfare.

The 1949 Geneva Convention includes a succession of strictures that parties involved in global conflicts should “respect without bias”. Convention IV emphasises the necessity to honor and assist with the supply of healthcare for civilians. GesitQQ

The philosophical base for those strictures is that the notion that the theatre of war is restricted to specified “battle spaces”. These must under no circumstances be permitted to encroach upon the domain of fundamental medical care, like the supply of healthcare services.

Regrettably, the majority of the posts of Geneva Convention have been violated in the years after their ratification. However, the targeting of healthcare in Syria represents a particularly egregious breach of strictures of interest to the supply of medical care.

Especially, it’s a good illustration of what scholars are calling that the “weaponisation of healthcare” a multi-dimensional strategy that includes practices like attacking health-care centers, targeting health employees, obliterating medical neutrality, and besieging medication.

The key global organisation influenced by authorities bombings was MSF.

What might not have been evident to an worldwide audience is the assault was preceded by five decades of targeting health-care facilities. Aside from the hundreds of healthcare personnel killed during the battle, virtually all hospitals in cities such as Aleppo happen to be shut.

From the start of the battle medical staff and healthcare centers are targeted”.

One of the policy recommendations of this report are:

  • Collect and disseminate precise and interrogate details regarding the character and degree of the regular strikes, for example, identification of perpetrators.
  • “explore war crimes, produce prosecutable cases, and set tribunals for prosecution”.
  • Academic and non-academic associations to run “essential research to create the evidence base for actions on issues impacting health employees in battle”.

Swift action on those recommendations is critical not just for the security of health-care employees, but also for deterring future compound attacks, like the bombing of Khan Shaykhun.

There is a hierarchical connection between biological warfare and the targeting of both health-care facilities. And in a deeper level, the two involve extending the theatre of war to the civilian realm, and the two harness the fragilities of the body.

A failure to stop attacks on healthcare may deliver mixed messages concerning the acceptability of “weaponising” the body.

A powerful commentator recently indicated that, instead of focusing on individual rights abuses, the global community must have as its principal goal a speedy conclusion to the battle.

Crucially, activity on human rights abuses isn’t necessarily opposed to some diffusion of anxieties, and, trivially, army retaliation isn’t the sole means of responding to rights violations.

What’s clear is that: in the middle of the fog of the Syrian war, obvious advice and increased assistance of health care employees could save hundreds of lives.